Section: Features , Peep-Show , Operating Systems , Leopard , OS-X , Originals Slick. Speedy. Sexy. Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious. You could easily replace the word “snow” in “Snow Leopard” with any other “s” adjective and still describe it accurately. Snow Leopard, by Apple’s own admission, is “The worlds most advanced operating system [Leopard]. Finely tuned.” It is, however, a truly unique experience for Mac users. This is the first time that an OS upgrade has not introduced major changes to the look, feel, and features of an OS, so there is virtually no learning curve. What there is, and love it we must, is simply a faster, easier, better…everything! And for 29 bucks, it can not be denied that this is easily the best OS upgrade the Mac has ever seen. What’s left out? First off, change is always hard, because you either cut something out or you end up with backwards compatible bloat a la Vista. Several big things have been lost in this revision, including PowerPC support (time to ditch the old Power- or i- computers, folks), Quicktime Pro, and Rosetta. Okay, those last two are sort of false positives: you can still run Quicktime 7 Pro – in fact if it is installed, the Snow Leopard installer will keep it, along with your license, and install Quicktime X side-by-side. And Rosetta is now an optional install, so you can get your PowerPC applications running if needed. In addition, Apple has dropped support for its original HFS file system, supporting only the more modern HFS+. HFS was introduced in 1985, and HFS+ in 1998 with OS 8.1, so this is not really a surprising move (24 years for a file format is pretty good). Undoubtedly a third party compatibility tool will arise for those few whose needs include archival disks, but for the majority of us, this isn’t a huge loss. What’s New? More intelligent everything. No, seriously. Apple has somehow managed to raise the functionality bar. The new Exposé features, better Stacks, and ability to minimize windows into an app’s Dock icon raise the Dock from an app launcher to a full-on computer interface. Most people seem to miss this in favor of the whiz-bang graphics, but if Apple is going for a Tablet computer, they’ve just built the only interface that computer would need in the Dock. Start paying attention Microsoft: the Start menu serves waaaaay too many functions, and doesn’t meet any of the needs fully. All Apple has to do is add a link to the hard drive any any attached/inserted storage media, and there’s suddenly no need for a desktop. Exposé now shows all windows, including those that have been minimized: Exposé is also activated for a particular app, when you hold the mouse button down on an app’s icon (notice the subtle highlighting): Stacks are now mini Finder windows—the iPod style of left-and-right moving, scrollable sheets has been been implemented (this is the Applications/Utilities folder): General slickness. Inertia. Animation. Seriously; when you scroll, FInder windows feel like iPhone lists, in that they scroll and then come go a gradual stop. Renamed files/folders zoom to their new positions in the Finder window, while the items displaced gracefully slide to their new positions. Everything about the system, including app launches and visual effects, feels faster, snappier, and somehow cooler. Size matters. One of Apple’s claims with Snow Leopard is that it will slim down the footprint of the OS on your hard drive; the published number is somewhere around six gigabytes. But many users are reporting heftier gains. How is this possible? Well, not only does Snow Leopard take up less space (it is literally half the OS, since all PowerPC libraries have been cut), but the OS also reports drive space in a different way now. For many years, there has been a dichotomy between geeks, who measure one gigabyte as 1,024 megabytes, and marketers, who rounded down to 1,000 (that’s why your 16 gig iPhone shows only 14.64 gigs in iTunes). Snow Leopard has done away with the double math, favoring the marketing number. So the free space reported on a disk post-Snow Leopard is not directly comparable to the pre-SL size



